Empty collars, empty dreams.

That's what further restrictions on New York pet breeders lead to.

Join the Dog Federation of New York's No Empty Collars Campaign

Empty collars are what unwarranted restrictions on pet owners and breeders promise. Don't be fooled. The muscle behind these proposals comes from radical animal rights organizations, not New York's millions of pet owners.

The Humane Society of the United States isn't your local animal shelter and the restrictions and regulations they advocate won't protect the health and welfare of animals.

New York dog owners and breeders care about animals. HSUS doesn't.

Three key proposals threaten pet ownership in New York

A7285 Paulin/S5392 Squadron: Outlaws custody or ownership of healthy, happy pet animals

A7285/S5392 targets moderate-sized breeders, sports and hunting kennels, and boarding facilities by making simple custody of "too many" intact dogs (or cats) illegal. Lobbied hard by the Humane Society of the United States, the proposal creates a brand new crime: custody of healthy, happy, well-cared for dogs and cats if you happen to have "too many." The bill permits animals to be seized and sold off -- or even killed -- before their owner has his/her day in court.

The Humane Society of the United States pretends the bill addresses abusive breeding facilities that violate existing state and federal law, but the proposal offers no new protections for animals.
Further analysis here.

A7983 Paulin/S4961 Oppenheimer: Endangers humane pet breeders, violates client/patient confidentiality

Buried in this mammoth proposal is the end to client or patient confidentiality for pet owners. The bill forces pet breeders to provide blanket authorizations for the release of their veterinary and private registry records for inspection by agents of the State of New York.

More information on the many defects in the proposal here.

A8352 Titone/ S4515 Lanza: Six pages of restrictions and penalties for breeding three puppies or kittens

Anyone who brings just three dogs or cats into the world is an instant "animal breeder" under this proposal, and instantly subject to six pages of regulations, restrictions, and inspections. Penalties for failure to comply with any provision included in the six pages go as high as $1,000 per violation.

DFNY's No Empty Collars Campaign

Think these proposals are scary? Outrageous? Completely unnecessary?

So do we.

Here's how to participate in the Dog Federation of New York's No Empty Collars Campaign.

1. Print out the Empty Collar Statement (cllick HERE to download), add your contact information, and sign it.

2. Get yourself a few dog or cat collars (available at many "dollar stores").

3. If you want, add additional information or your own letter for legislators.

4. Immediately mail (good), or personally deliver (best!) copies and your Empty Collars to:

Assemblyman Bill Magee

Chairman, New York State Assembly Committee on Agriculture

Legislative Office Building 828, Albany, NY 12248

Senator Darrel Aubertine

Chairman, New York State Senate Committee on Agriculture

903 Legislative Office Building, Albany, New York 12247

Still have a few Empty Collars?

Send them to:

Assemblyman Sheldon Silver, Speaker of the New York State Assembly, 932 Legislative Office Building, Albany, NY 12248

Senator Malcolm A. Smith, President Pro Tem of the New York State Senate, 909 Legislative Office Building, Albany, NY 12247

Your own elected representatives.

Nothing but Empty Collars for New York pet lovers?

We hope not.

Please join the Dog Federation of New York in reaching out to our elected representatives, and help us protect lawful and humane pet breeders. We believe that locally bred, locally raised dogs and cats are a reasonable choice for New Yorkers who want to add a pet to their families.

Let's make sure that the future holds more than empty collars for us all.

New York State Assembly Poised to Act on Bill
Holding Animal Owners Guilty Until Proven Innocent
Dog owner group calls on elected Albany representatives

to uphold state laws, challenges A9400 (Paulin) as illegal,

a direct violation of civil rights and misuse of public funds

March 12, 2010: The Dog Federation of New York (DFNY) today expressed deep concern regarding Assemblywoman Amy Paulin’s proposal regarding security bonds requirements in cases of animal cruelty allegations, placed on the agenda for the Assembly Agriculture meeting of March 16, 2009. A9400 expands on a highly questionable existing state law allowing pre-trial, permanent forfeiture of valuable animals—personal property—if defendants are unable to promptly post high cost security bonds to cover the maintenance of impounded animals pending resolution of charges.

Citing concerns of erroneous deprivation, a U. S. District Court in another jurisdiction struck down a substantially similar law on constitutional grounds in late 2009. Under existing New York law, defendants without the resources to post security bonds face immediate, permanent forfeiture of their animals to private impounding organizations before any action may be taken in their defense. Impounding organizations may then kill or sell off forfeited animals, retaining the proceeds for themselves.

In direct contradiction to existing state law, Paulin’s A9400 enhances forfeiture proceedings by requiring civil servants--district attorneys on the public payroll—to represent the interests of private corporations during security bond hearings. In addition to illegally requiring district attorneys, charged with defending the interests of the people of the State of New York, to represent private, not for profit corporations (impounding organizations), A9400 also violates state law by requiring district attorneys to act in civil matters such as the security bond hearings proposed by the bill.

“The members of the New York State Assembly have a duty to uphold the law. The Constitution of the State of New York and the U. S. Constitution protect the civil rights of all citizens, and the presumption of innocence, regardless of the nature of allegations, is fundamental,” said Mahlon Goer, Dog Federation of New York spokesperson. “We’d like to see Assemblywoman Paulin and the New York State Assembly uphold the law. Defendants cannot be assessed high financial penalties or face permanent loss of their animals—their personal property—before their trial even begins.”

Civil rights advocates also expressed concern that under the proposal defendants relying on public defenders must appear in court without the benefit of legal counsel during security bond hearings headed by district attorneys. Public defenders cannot act in civil matters in New York. A9400 requires defendants to cover the cost of maintaining animals no longer in their custody. New York State’s Criminal Procedure Law § 690.55 clearly places the responsibility for maintaining seized property on law enforcement personnel pending resolution of charges.

“We believe that all responsible owners of animals share a concern for the well being of pets and livestock, “ Goer continued. “Under the law, we are explicitly required to provide for their welfare and should be held accountable if we fail. However, our concerns cannot drive us to surrender the protection of our civil rights. We are innocent until proven guilty.”

S3155, Senator Craig Johnson’s companion bill to A9400, remains with the New York Senate Committee on Agriculture.

About the Dog Federation of New York

The Dog Federation of New York is a statewide coalition of dog clubs, organizations and individual dog owners that serves the public interest by educating citizens and public officials on responsible dog ownership. DFNY advocates for dog-friendly, dog-safe communities for all New Yorkers, and strong, and humane dog-related legislation. DFNY is committed to working with public officials to address the concerns we all share.

###

Post script: On March 26, and despite the many, many phone calls and emails sent to the NYS Assembly Committee on Agriculture by concerned New Yorkers, Asy. Amy Paulin's proposal was referred favorably to the Assembly Codes committee.

Watch this space -- or join the Dog Federation of New York's email list (information in the sidebar at right) -- for further information on how to oppose this bill.

New York State Assembly Passes Bill

Attacking Presumption of Innocence

DFNY calls on elected Albany representatives to uphold state laws,
challenges A3765 (Englebright) as direct violation of civil rights and misuse of public funds

The Dog Federation of New York expresses deep concern over the recent passage of Assemblyman Steven Englebright’s proposal to allow petitions for security bonds to be made by district attorneys on the public payroll when defendants are arraigned following allegations of cruelty to animals. Under existing state law, defendants unable to promptly post costly security bonds face immediate, permanent forfeiture of their animals to private impounding organizations before any action may be taken in their defense.

In direct contradiction to existing state law, A3765 authorizes district attorneys, charged with defending the interests of the people of the State of New York, to represent private, not for profit corporations (impounding organizations). Existing state law also prohibits district attorneys from acting in civil matters, such as the petitions for security bonds covered by Asy. Englebright’s bill.

“The members of the New York State Assembly have a duty to uphold the law, the Constitution of the State of New York and the U. S. Constitution, and to protect the civil rights of all its citizens. The presumption of innocence, regardless of the nature of allegations made against a defendant, is one of our most basic, most cherished values”, said Mahlon Goer, Dog Federation of New York spokesperson. “We’d like to see Assemblyman Englebright and the New York State legislature uphold the law. Defendants cannot be assessed high financial penalties or permanent loss of their animals—their personal property—before their trial even begins.”

Civil rights advocates also expressed concern that defendants relying on public defenders must appear in court without the benefit of legal counsel during security bond hearings. Public defenders cannot act in civil matters in New York.

Under Assemblyman Englebright’s A3765 defendants are required to cover the cost of maintaining valuable animals no longer in their custody, or permanently forfeit them to a private corporation. The private corporation is then free to either kill the animals or sell them off and retain the proceeds, in contradiction to New York State’s Criminal Procedure Law § 690.55 which clearly places the responsibility for maintaining seized property on publicly employed law enforcement personnel pending resolution of charges.

“We believe that all responsible owners of animals share a concern for the well being of pets and livestock, “ Goer continued. “Under the law, we are explicitly required to provide for their welfare and should be held accountable if we fail. However, our concerns cannot drive us to surrender the protection of our civil rights. We are innocent until proven guilty.”

S5479, the Senate companion bill to A3765 sponsored by Senator Jeffrey Klein, remains with the New York Senate Committee on Agriculture.

Help preserve civil rights in New York! Stop A3765 and S5479 !

You can make a difference!

DFNY prepared talking points and an analysis of A3765/S5479 and A9400/S3155 -- two other nearly identical proposals before the NYS legislature on pre-trial animal forfeiture provisions. The proposals are nearly identical in their negative impact on civil rights in New York.

For talking points an analysis of Senate proposals, click here.

For talking points and analysis of the remaining Assembly proposal, click here.

Please immediately telephone or email the Chair of the NYS Senate Committee on Agriculture, Senator Darrel Aubertine, and ask him to stand up for civil rights in New York by holding Senate bills S5479 and S3155 in committee. Phone calls are best!

In Watertown 315-782-3418
In Albany 518-455-2761
In Oswego 315-312-3106
email: aubertin@senate.state.ny.us

Please also immediately telephone or email the Chair of the NYS Assembly Committee on Agriculture, Assemblyman Bill Magee, and ask him to stand up for civil rights in New York by holding Assembly bill A9400 in committee. Phone calls are best!

In Oneida 315-361-4125
In Albany 518-455-4807
In Oneonta 607-432-1484
email: MageeW@assembly.state.ny.us

Our concerns about the welfare of animals cannot drive us to surrender our hard fought civil rights! Ask Senator Aubertine and Assemblyman Magee to uphold the law!

Local Hunters Receive Commendations for Rescuing Dog in Desperate Need

Dog Federation Of New York salutes trio of Saratoga-area men who saved Daisy’s life

Albany, NY – November 16, 2009 - The Dog Federation of New York (DFNY) today issued letters of commendation and thanks to Ed Dandaraw, Tom Peters and Kevin McCauliffe, the Saratoga-area deer hunters whose quick response to a pet’s dire distress saved her life. Dandaraw was hunting on his property with his two companions when he came across the cruelly taped and bound beagle. Daisy had been covered with duct tape, wrapped in a plastic garbage bag, and left to die in a swampy, remote area on Dandaraw’s property. She had been missing from home for two weeks.

Because of the difficult terrain, the men needed to use a four-wheeler to get the dog to safety. A former beagle owner himself, Dandaraw took the dog to his own veterinarian and was prepared to provide Daisy with a new home if her owners could not be located. Happily, the dog’s distraught family was quickly identified and Daisy is back home, responding well to treatment and gaining weight steadily.

“On behalf of dog lovers everywhere, we want to express our gratitude to Ed Dandaraw, Tom Peter and Kevin McCauliffe,” commented DFNY spokesperson Mahlon Goer. “Without their quick thinking and commitment to saving her life, Daisy would have died.”

A confirmed animal lover who owns goats, chickens and a cat, Dandaraw describes himself and his hunting companions as “regular people” who didn’t hesitate when help was needed. “The day we rescued that little dog was one of the best days of my life.”

The Saratoga County Sheriff's Department is in charge of the investigation of the crime, and persons with information are asked to contact the Department at (518) 885-6761. Because Daisy’s veterinary needs have been addressed and she is recuperating well, the Dog Federation of New York suggests that dog and animal lovers wishing to make a contribution consider a donation to the local animal shelter of their choice.

About the Dog Federation of New YorkThe Dog Federation of New York is a statewide coalition of dog clubs and organizations that serves the public interest by educating citizens and legislators on responsible dog ownership and advocating for strong, and humane dog-related legislation. The Dog Federation of New York welcomes all dog owners and dog-related organizations in New York. On the web at http://www.dogfederationofnewyork.org/

Recent federal decision suggests defects
in New York Ag. & Mkts. law

Provisions similar to NY law found unconstitutional

In early October, 2009 the U. S. District Court Western District in Louisville, Kentucky, struck down parts of a municipal ordinance which were substantially similar to existing New York law governing forfeiture of animals in animal cruelty cases. The federal court enjoined the City of Louisville from enforcement of §91.101 of Metro Louisville’s controversial “Animal Ordinance”, because the forfeiture provision “threatens to deprive pet owners of their property rights without a finding of guilt (emphasis added).”

A copy of Judge Simpson’s entire Order and Memorandum Opinion is available here. To quote his discussion of the section of the Louisville ordinance allowing animals to be seized and forfeited prior to adjudication of charges if the defendant fails to post a security bond to guarantee the cost of maintaining the animal(s) during proceedings, the court reasoned:

“It is perfectly possible for a judge to find probable cause that a person has committed an offense, but for the person to later be found innocent. Under the scheme set up [in Louisville] if a person was unable to put up $450 immediately upon the probable cause finding, his pet is forfeit and he has no apparent recourse for its recovery, even if he is ultimately found innocent of the underlying charge. There is thus a high risk of erroneous deprivation.” (emphasis added)

Does New York law support erroneous deprivation?

As was the case in Louisville, existing New York State law allows similar onerous financial requirements to be placed upon defendants at arraignment by the filing of civil petitions for security bonds requesting the cost of maintaining animals seized while charges are pending.

The relevant section of Agriculture and Markets Law Article 26, §373(6)(a), setting out seizure and subsequent forfeiture proceedings reads:

. . .[U]pon arraignment of charges the duly incorporated society for the prevention of cruelty to animals, humane society, pound, animal shelter or any authorized agents thereof, hereinafter referred to for the purposes of this section as the "impounding organization", may file a petition with the court requesting that the person from whom an animal is seized or the owner of the animal be ordered to post a security.

Note that in New York, unlike Louisville, beneficiary impounding organizations are private, not for profit corporations or authorized agents, and not a municipal agency. Forfeited property (animals) goes to the private impounding organization, not the State of New York.

Agriculture and Markets Article 26, §373(6)(b)(2) continues:

"If the court orders the posting of a security, the security shall be posted with the clerk of the Court within five business days of the hearing provided for in subparagraph one of this paragraph. The court may order the immediate forfeiture of the seized animal to the impounding organization if the person ordered to post the security fails to do so. Any animal forfeited shall be made available for adoption or euthanized subject to subdivision seven-a of section one hundred eighteen of this chapter or section three hundred seventy-four of this article.” (emphasis added)

These provisions mean that if the defendant has the money to pay the bond (often thousands and tens of thousands of dollars per month), the animal owner is disbursing money prior to discovery, pre-trial motion hearings, prior to trial, and obviously, prior to a verdict on the alleged charges.

Conversely, if the defendant does not have the finances to pay the thousands and tens of thousands of dollars per month, he will immediately forfeit his animals - his property – prior to any action being taken in his defense.

Equally disturbing is that security bond petitions are civil matters; defendants relying on a publically-provided attorney will not have the benefit of counsel during the security bond hearing, a civil matter. Public defenders represent defendants in criminal matters in New York.

Disposition of seized property in New York

Estimated costs to be born by an impounding organization with custody of seized animals are cited as justification for security bonds. In essence, New York’s forfeiture provisions make the defendant responsible for preserving the evidence – the seized animals (property). This provision is antithetical to the provisions of state law, which clearly places the onus for maintaining seized property on the courts and the agencies which have custody.

Criminal procedure law reads (emphasis added):

§ 690.55 Search warrants; disposition of seized property.
1. Upon receiving property seized pursuant to a search warrant, the court must either:

(a) Retain it in the custody of the court pending further disposition thereof pursuant to subdivision two or some other provision of law; or

(b) Direct that it be held in the custody of the person who applied for the warrant, or of the police officer who executed it, or of the governmental or official agency or department by which either such public servant is employed, upon condition that upon order of such court such property be returned thereto or delivered to another court.

Under this section of the law, the court, the search warrant applicant, police officer that executed the search warrant or the government or official agency that employs that public servant are responsible for the care of evidence once seized and in its custody. Period.

Defendants cannot be divested of their property -- property no longer in their possession -- because the cost of maintaining evidence is not being covered by the courts. This is a clear violation of the defendant’s right to due process. It is unconstitutional and must be repealed.

As an alternative to costly seizures and impoundments, Agriculture & Markets Law provides for what can be referred to as a “seize in place.” AML § 373(7) provides that animals may be left in the care of the owner, with court-ordered supervision by authorities to guarantee their welfare, pending adjudication of charges against the owner.

Erroneous deprivation here and now

Private, not-for-profit corporations acting as complainants, and ultimately as impounding organizations, benefit through their participation in New York’s pre-adjudication forfeiture proceedings because they receive either the monies from the security bonds , or the valuable animals forfeited. Such animals are transferred to the impounding organization almost immediately following the defendant’s arrest and, with little or no monetary investment from the organization, may soon be sold by the organization.

These are clear financial incentives to seizure and subsequent forfeiture of animals in New York. Consequently the troubling, corrupt pattern of pre-adjudication forfeiture is well established.

Louisville and you

In Louisville, Judge Simpson wrote that “we must hold that the portion of [the Louisville ordinance] that would permanently deprive a pet owner of his property, absent a finding of guilt, is unconstitutional.”

We believe that all responsible owners of animals share a concern for the well being of pets and livestock. Under the law, we are explicitly required to provide for their welfare and should be held accountable if we fail. However, our concerns cannot drive us to surrender the protections of our civil liberties that the U. S. and New York Constitutions afford.

We are innocent until proven guilty.

New York's "Puppymill Proposals"

Puppies! What would the world be without 'em?

Some New Yorkers may not realize it, but many proposed revisions to state law -- marketed by proponents pushing a national extremist agenda -- are based on misinformation, myth and fear-mongering.

Many proposals would make the breeding and care of puppies in the homes and kennels of hobby breeders, and sportsmen and women impossible.

Here's a careful, point-by-point analysis of Assemblywoman Amy Paulin's A7983 and State Senator Suzi Oppenheimer's S4961, proposals placing numerous, cumbersome and inappropriate restrictions on New York's home and hobby breeders.

DFNY's members don't want to live in a world without puppies. We believe New Yorkers should
have a range of choices when selecting a new dog for their home because no option is right for everyone.

A locally-bred, locally-raised dog from a home or hobby breeder is an excellent decision for many families, and legislation that would make such pups unavailable to most New Yorkers just isn't fair.

DFNY Joins New York Farm Bureau to Oppose
Proposed Limit Laws on Dog and Cat Ownership

A 7285, S 5392 and S 4690 contribute nothing to animal well-being

These proposals allow for the seizure of animals if any person or business "has in its care"more than 50 intact dogs or cats over the age of 4 months, without the slightest regard to the health of the animals or the conditions of care provided to them.

In fact, proposals like S5392 do not offer a single protection to dogs and cats over and above existing, comprehensive, New York State laws on cruelty to animals and regulations for pet dealers.

Seized animals may be sold off or killed by the impounding agency if security bond requirements are not met within five days.

S 5392 is on the NY Senate Agriculture committee agenda for June 2, 2009. Please join the Dog Federation of New York in opposing it, and immediately write or phone NY Senate Agriculture Committee Chair Darrel Aubertine and Senate Agriculture committee members to express your concern regarding extremist proposals.

If enacted, a law like S 5392 would devastate lawful, humane hobbyists, pet breeders and sports enthusiasts.

For more information on the many defects and problems in these proposals, see DFNY's position paper.

Read the New York Farm Bureau's opposition statement here.

The Dog Federation of New York believes that one abused animal is one too many. We stand for strong and humane animal-related legislation. . . not numbers games.

We urge the consistent enforcement of reasonable, effective animal cruelty laws. We reject proposals which would shut down lawful, humanely operated kennels and businesses while doing nothing to protect the animals we love.

New York City Housing Authority (NYCHA)
Bans dogs based on breed and size

One pet per home, no intact dogs or cats


DFNY joins stunned residents of New York City's more than 178,000 public housing units--home to more than 400,000 people--in opposing a newly implemented policy banning dogs based on breed or type (no "pit bulls," Rottweilers or Dobermans), and size (no dogs over 25 lbs.). The new rules took effect on May 1, 2009, and apply to any pets not "grandfathered in" prior to May 1.

NYCHA rules also limit public housing residents to one dog or cat, and requires that the pets be surgically sterilized.

DFNY members vigorously oppose breed specific measures, which are based on negative stereotypes of both dogs and dog owners. No credible expert on community safety and dog bite prevention supports breed profiling, and breed specific public policies are opposed by the Centers for Disease Control and the American Veterinary Medicine Association.

New York State law clearly prohibits breed specific laws and New York courts have repeatedly struck down breed specific dangerous dog laws.

In addition, we are deeply disappointed to learn that residents of New York City's vast public housing system are limited to a single dog that cannot exceed a specific weight, and are required to submit their dogs to surgical sterilization in order to avoid eviction.

The Dog Federation of New York is committed to helping elected officials and public agencies respond appropriately to the concerns we all share: protecting the health and safety of the citizens of New York, and helping New York remain a dog-friendly, dog-safe place to live. Our letter calling on New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg to use his good offices to bring about a change in NYCHA policy may be read here.

We join the American Kennel Club in opposing NYCHA's pet policy. A copy of the AKC letter to NYCHA is available here.

What you can do:

Advocacy groups for public housing residents such as GOLES are working to organize opposition to NYCHA's pet policy, and they need the help of concerned pet lovers everywhere.

Download and circulate this petition ! Signed petitions should be returned to: GOLES, 169 Avenue B, New York, NY 10009

Write to Mayor Bloomberg ! NYCHA's Board of Directors is appointed by the Mayor.

Snail mail: Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg, City Hall, New York, NY 10007

FAX (212) 312-0700

E-MAIL:http://www.nyc.gov/html/mail/html/mayor.html

Mark your calendars ! The public will have the opportunity to comment on NYCHA policy during a hearing on on June 23. Be there!

Tuesday, June 23, 2009
from 5:30 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. at:
The Manhattan Center
Grand Ballroom
311 West 34th Street
New York, New York

DOG FEDERATION OF NEW YORK LAUNCHES
DOG BITE PREVENTION PSA RADIO ADS IN HUDSON VALLEY

Local Broadcasters Team Up With Dog Federation Of New York and
Campaign for Responsible Ownership To Help Create Dog-Friendly, Dog-Safe™ Communities

Poughkeepsie, NY – May 4, 2009 – The Dog Federation of New York has launched a new, public service awareness radio campaign to help educate the public about dog safety, prevent dog bites and with the help of local radio broadcasters, create Dog-Friendly, Dog-Safe Communities™ across New York State.

The statewide dog bite prevention project is intended to reduce or prevent the estimated 4.7 million dog bites that occur each year. According to the Centers For Disease Control, most dog bite victims are young children under twelve, and through education most dog bites are highly preventable.

The public service radio campaign kicks off just in time for National Dog Bite Prevention Week, which runs from May 17 to May 23, and will air on local stations across the Hudson Valley region. The PSA radio spots are based on research and recommendations from the Centers For Disease Control and the American Veterinary Medical Association, and communicate simple dog bite prevention tips.

“The spots are easy for parents to remember” says Mahlon Goer of the DFNY, coordinator for the dog safety effort in the Hudson Valley. Please Say Please teaches children to ask permission before petting a dog. Loose Dog, Lost Dog and Be A Tree are spots about staying safe. Listeners learn how to Contain Humanely and equally important in preventing dog bites, Social Animal reminds us that dogs really do need a social life.

Experts Dr. Julie Gilchrist, MD of the Center For Disease Control and Dr. Gail Golab, PhD, DVM of the American Veterinary Medical Association are co-authors of the joint CDC/AVMA report, A Community Approach To Dog Bite Prevention. As the country’s leading authorities on dog bites, they say it’s critical to appropriately choose, train, socialize, and maintain a dog. Furthermore, the experts say it is owner behavior, not the breed of dog or other factors, that is the key to bite prevention.

“We need to make sure that every parent and every child is educated about dog safety – even if they don’t own a dog”, said The Campaign’s founder, Ms. Haywood, “We can prevent dog bites and we can work to eliminate rare but tragic serious attacks. Thanks to the generous and caring support of local broadcasters that air the PSA radio spots and the Dog Federation Of New York, we’re all working together to protect children and create Dog-Friendly, Dog-Safe™ Communities”.

“We are extremely grateful to Franz Kaisik at WDST Radio Woodstock, and Kenya Gipson of Clear Channel of the Hudson Valley for airing the PSA’s, such as Supervise For Safety, Be A Tree and Please Say Please, from the Campaign For Responsible Ownership. We thank them for sharing our commitment to protect our children and the entire community."

DFNY Speaks Truth to Power

Because it is so important that our elected officials and public servants base public policy decisions on correct information, and input reflecting the values and needs of New York residents and constituents, the Dog Federation of New York is pleased to share a series of "talking point" flyers for concerned dog owners and pet lovers.

We invite you to take these flyers with you when you visit your representatives. Watch this spot for additional flyers on other subjects of concern to caring New York dog owners.

The Truth about. . .

Tethering

Dogfighting

"Puppymills"

Tail Docking

Keep in touch! Join the DFNY elist for further information on these and other issues!

Dog Federation of New York Sets Record Straight on
New York’s Dog and Animal Fighting Statutes

Group Expresses Concern that Inaccurate Information May Encourage Mistrust and Fear

March 5, 2009 – New York, NY -- Responding to irresponsibly-worded statements circulating on the internet regarding New York’s dog and animal fighting statutes, members of the Dog Federation of New York (DFNY) today provided the facts for worried pet lovers. Contrary to recent media coverage, New York’s anti-dogfighting statutes are among the most comprehensive in the nation.

"Only a person unfamiliar with our laws and how they function would describe them as ‘weak’," commented Mahlon Goer, spokesperson. “Under state law, a number of felony charges are available to prosecutors in dog-fighting cases. Our statutes and penalties are in line with, and in some cases exceed, those of neighboring states.”

“We were disappointed to see poorly-considered and speculative comments circulating on the web. Bad information only deepens misunderstanding, and encourages heightened levels of mistrust and fear of both dogs and dog owners. New Yorkers deserve public policy based on fact, not fear.”

The abhorrent crimes of organized dog and animal-fighting are serious offenses in New York, and DFNY hastened to correct any mistaken impressions that these crimes are common.

The New York-based ASPCA enforces animal cruelty laws, including anti-dogfighting statutes, in the City of New York. The ASPCA cautions that dogfighting exists all over the United States, but that it is not prevalent in New York City.

Information made available by the New York State Department of Criminal Justice indicates that for the last ten years, the number of convictions per year on animal-fighting charges in New York City typically hovers in the very low single digits. For several years out of the last ten, no convictions on animal-fighting charges were recorded for New York City. Statistics for New York State follow a similar pattern.

“Dogfighting is a heinous crime with serious consequences. We want to make sure that New York’s caring dog owners and pet lovers, and our public officials, have the facts before them,” said Ms. Goer. DFNY offers its resources and assistance to the public and community leaders to help educate the public on New York’s dog and animal fighting statutes and related issues. The group’s website offers information on these topics.

About the Dog Federation of New York:

The Dog Federation of New York is a statewide coalition of dog clubs, organizations and individual dog owners that serves the public interest by educating citizens and public officials on dog safety and responsible dog ownership. DFNY advocates for strong, and humane dog-related legislation and is committed to working with municipalities across the state to implement preventative dog safety education.

Read New York State's statutes on animal fighting.

New Rochelle Dog Owners Successful in Lawsuit Against City
Challenge Secures Reasonable Access to Public Space

Dog Federation Of New York congratulates local residents who challenged policies restricting and penalizing law-abiding citizens

The Dog Federation of New York (DFNY) celebrates news of a final settlement in the lawsuit brought by three New Rochelle dog owners against the City of New Rochelle. The lawsuit centered on whether the City of New Rochelle could require law-abiding dog owners to buy costly special licenses simply to walk a leashed dog in a public park. Long an advocate of reasonable access to public spaces for responsible dog owners, DFNY appeared as amicus curiae in the suit, captioned During et. al v. The City of New Rochelle.

The New Rochelle ordinance required the purchase an expensive special license to walk dogs, leashed or unleashed, in the open public parkland of Ward Acres. Following commencement of the suit, the City of New Rochelle dropped the special licensing requirement and also agreed to substantially reduce fees charged for use of a three acre fenced-in dog park located within Ward Acres. Ward Acres is the only park open to dog walkers in the City of New Rochelle.

“Thanks to the perseverance of dog owners in New Rochelle, walking a dog in Ward Acres Park is no longer subject to special fees and police scrutiny,” commented Dog Federation of New York spokesperson Mahlon Goer. “As law-abiding and caring dog owners, we believe that reasonable access to public space for all members of the community is essential. We are very pleased with the outcome in New Rochelle.”

“Close to half of all households in New York include at least one dog,” Goer continued. “Our goal is to promote dog-friendly and dog-safe communities for all New Yorkers, and we are very happy that a fair accommodation was reached.”

About During et al. v. City of New Rochelle
The case was originally filed on April 16, 2007, as Dennis C. During, Michael S. Friscia and Marci Malone v. The City of New Rochelle in New York Supreme Court, Westchester County, Hon. W. D. Donovan presiding, Index No. 6561/07. The law firm of Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP in New York City represented the Dog Federation of New York as amicus curiae on a pro bono basis.

Press contacts: Patricia B. Wild, Attorney for Plaintiffs (914) 834-3969
Jeffrey P. Wiegand, Press Contact (914) 374-8320
To learn more about Ward Acres, the Westchester dog-owning community, visit We Love Ward Acres.

About the Dog Federation of New York
The Dog Federation of New York is a statewide coalition of dog clubs, organizations and individual dog owners that serves the public interest by educating citizens and public officials on dog safety and responsible dog ownership. DFNY advocates for strong, and humane dog-related legislation and is committed to working with municipalities across the state.

Westchester Dog Owners Win Appeals Court Decision

Dog Federation Of New York celebrates decision allowing challenge to
unlawful, discriminatory public policies targeting law-abiding dog owners

New York, NY – October 15, 2008 - The Dog Federation of New York (DFNY), appearing as amicus curiae in the case of During et. al v. The City of New Rochelle, applauds a decision from the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division, Second Department, reversing a lower court dismissal of the case. During oral argument on September 15, the Presiding Judge advised the City of New Rochelle to try to settle with local dog owners. The case is remitted to the Supreme Court, Westchester County for further proceedings.

The New Rochelle dog owners seek nullification of the city’s unprecedented, illegal, and punitive local ordinance, which unfairly requires them to obtain extra photo identifications and licenses, and pay special additional fees, simply to walk a dog in a public park. Dog walkers with leashed dogs in Ward Acres Park in New Rochelle are subject to a disturbing stop-and-search policy in which police officers are instructed to stop people walking their dogs and demand to see a special “Ward Acres Dog Permit” photo identification. Persons unable to produce the special licenses are asked to leave the park and, under the terms of the Ordinance, they are potentially subject to fines and/or imprisonment.

"As a statewide coalition of law-abiding dog owners, we are deeply concerned when a municipality illegally targets residents and tax-payers whose only ‘crime’ is walking a dog in a public place," stated DFNY spokesperson Mahlon Goer. “New Rochelle residents and non-residents alike are not second class citizens, and state law protects them from unwarranted searches, special license requirements, extra taxes, and other infringements of their civil liberties.”

"Ward Acres was the last park in New Rochelle open to people who want to walk their dogs, and now the City Council seems bent on forcing them out of it. Close to half of all households in New York include at least one dog, and we were surprised and dismayed to see that a better accommodation could not be worked out,” Goer continued. “Our goal is to promote dog-friendly and dog-safe communities for all New Yorkers. We are confident that better solutions are available.”

Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP in New York City represented the Dog Federation of New York in the appeal. The case was originally filed on April 16, 2007, as Dennis C. During, Michael S. Friscia and Marci Malone v. The City of New Rochelle in New York Supreme Court, Westchester County, Hon. W. D. Donovan presiding, Index No. 6561/07.

For further information on the amicus brief, please contact the Dog Federation of New York. A copy of the appeals court decision is available via this link.

To learn more about Ward Acres, the Westchester dog-owning community, visit www.WeLoveWardAcres.net.

About the Dog Federation of New York:
The Dog Federation of New York is a statewide coalition of dog clubs, organizations and individual dog owners that serves the public interest by educating citizens and public officials on dog safety and responsible dog ownership. DFNY advocates for strong, and humane dog-related legislation and is committed to working with municipalities across the state.
Visit us on the web at www.DogFederationofNewYork.org

###

Dog Federation of New York Expresses Sorrow at Death of Staten Island Dog Attack Victim, Urges Full Investigation of Previous Complaints

Group Stresses Prevention of Tragedies Through Enforcement of Laws Requiring Humane Containment of Dogs

August 21, 2008 – New York, NY: The Dog Federation of New York (DFNY) today issued a statement expressing deepest condolences to the family of Mr. Henry Piotrowski upon news of his death following a dog attack on Staten Island earlier this summer.

“Sadly, Mr. Piotrowski’s death could have been prevented” said Mahlon Goer of the DFNY. “According to neighbors, city authorities were alerted eight or nine times regarding those dogs. That is eight or nine missed opportunities to prevent Mr. Piotrowski’s death. We question why the city failed to respond to complaints of loose and threatening dogs and reiterate our call for a full and complete investigation.”

Ms. Goer continued, “It is critical that we educate our entire community, especially our children and the elderly, about safety around dogs and the importance of responsible, humane restraint and containment.” Mr. Piotrowski was 90 years old when he died.

DFNY offers its resources, free of charge, to the family, the public, and city leaders. To help educate the public about dog bite prevention, the Dog Federation of New York reaches out to local community leaders with preventative safety and educational programs centered on material published by the Centers for Disease Control and the American Veterinary Medicine Association.

According to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), almost all dog bites are preventable and fatalities are exceedingly rare. Neither the breed of dog, nor the method of restraint, are reliable indicators of the likelihood of dog bites. The Centers for Disease Control warns that dog bite-related fatalities are very unusual occurrences and that such tragedies should not be used to formulate public safety policies.

“It is our goal to educate every New Yorker about dog bite prevention and keeping our communities safe,” said Ms. Goer. To help get the message to the community, DFNY offers free Public Service Announcements (PSA’s) on dog bite prevention from the Campaign for Responsible Ownership. The PSA’s are based on research and recommendations from both the Centers for Disease Control and the American Veterinary Medical Association.

Peter Vallone, Jr. Joins Animal Rights Extremists In Plan To Ban Dog Breeds And Humane Restraint

Dog Federation Of New York rejects NYC Councilman Peter Vallone Jr.’s plan based on animal extremism and discriminatory profiling of dogs and their owners

New York, NY – July 10, 2008 - The Dog Federation of New York (DFNY) is calling on dog owners throughout New York State to reject New York City Councilman Peter Vallone Jr.’s plans to work with animal rights extremists at PETA to ban certain breeds of dogs and enact anti-tethering laws which ban the humane restraint of dogs and endanger the community.

According to the New York Sun, Peter Vallone, Jr. is welcoming support by PETA to help push his plan foward. PETA, an animal rights extremist organization, is known for calling mothers who give their children milk or meat “abusive” or “murderers”, equating pet ownership to slavery, and providing support to domestic terrorists Rodney Coronado and ALF, the Animal Liberation Front.

In addition, PETA angered many of the state's animal welfare advocates by calling for the euthanasia of all “pitbulls” in shelters. According to the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, PETA killed over 97% of animals in their care in 2006. . "We are deeply concerned about Councilman Vallone's motives and his grasp of the facts. His association with PETA is troubling," stated DFNY spokesperson Mahlon Goer.

“Councilman Vallone’s focus should be on increasing the health and safety of the community in accordance with the fact-based guidelines set forth by Centers For Disease Control and the American Veterinary Medical Association.”

Earlier this month, a dog attack on Staten Island involved unrestrained, loose dogs which were reportedly allowed to roam free on numerous occasions despite repeated complaints to authorities from the community. The DFNY immediately called for a full investigation as to why police and animal control failed to respond to numerous calls made by concerned neighbors about loose and roaming dogs.

Following this incident, Vallone announced his plan to ask the New York State Legislature to overturn the long-standing New York State law that protects dogs from breed discrimination, and to restrict the ability of caring dog owners to safely and humanely restrain their pets.

“Sadly, Mr. Vallone is choosing to exploit this tragic situation to grab headlines with inflammatory statements and false or misleading information”. If the dogs had been securely and humanely restrained, the attack may have been prevented. Proper tethering is a responsible and humane form of restraint which safeguards both the community and the dog.”

Ms. Goer further stated, “It is imperative that we protect our children and communities with laws based on facts, not fear. Councilman Vallone consistently has used misinformation as a calculated means to heighten public fears and misunderstanding, along with employing provocative language and negative stereotypes."

“Anti-tethering laws also unfairly target the poor, and may disproportionately affect African-American and Hispanic dog owners living in urban or rural areas. We are worried about his agenda,” said Goer. “Race may be a factor”.

Councilman Vallone’s proposal to discriminate against good dogs and caring dog owners with a breed ban and anti-tethering law was thoroughly rejected by New York’s concerned pet owners and animal groups last year.

Despite claims floating on the Internet that tethering dogs increases aggression, the claims have no basis in fact. Goer cited the expert testimony of Dr. Katherine Houpt of Cornell University’s College of Veterinary Medicine Department of Biomedical Sciences, the country’s leading expert on the issue of tethering. Dr. Houpt, who has studied the issue for years, found that tethering does not increase aggression in dogs.

Furthermore, neither the U. S. government's Centers for Disease Control (CDC), nor the American Veterinary Medicine Association (AVMA) condones anti-tethering laws. Spokespeople for both organizations indicate that there is no scientific evidence to support such efforts.

Goer continued, "Both of Councilman Vallone’s proposals are based on bad information. Since he couldn’t ban breeds, now he wants a tethering law. Vallone’s lack of concern for good dogs and good owners, and his obvious profiling tactics, reflect poorly on him. They are an embarrassment for the New York City Council, and all New York dog lovers."

“We want to make sure that New York remains the most dog-friendly place in the world”, said Ms. Goer. “Discrimination, whether against dogs or their owners, is just not acceptable”.

DFNY Sends Sympathies to Staten Island Dog Attack Victim,
Urges Full Investigation of Previous Complaints

Group Aims to Prevent Future Tragedies Through Enforcement
of Laws Requiring Humane Containment of Dogs

July 2, 2008 – New York, NY -- In response to news of a dog attack resulting in serious injuries in Staten Island, New York, members of the Dog Federation of New York (DFNY) today issued a statement of sympathy and support for Henry Piotrowski and his family. Mr. Piotrowski was gravely injured by two dogs that entered his yard. Press reports indicate that residents had complained repeatedly about the dogs, which have since been euthanized.

"Our hearts go out to Mr. Piotrowski, his family and his friends," commented Mahlon Goer, spokesperson. “While the exact events leading to the attack are still unknown, it appears that the dogs were allowed to roam and menace members of the community on previous occasions, and that authorities were alerted repeatedly. We are calling for a full investigation into the circumstances which led to this tragedy.”

According to the Centers for Disease Control, almost all dog bites are preventable. Neither the breed of dog, nor the method of restraint are reliable indicators of the likelihood of dog bites.

“We want to make sure we educate the entire community to prevent future tragedies such as this,” said Ms. Goer. DFNY is offering its resources and assistance to the family, the public, and community leaders. To help educate the public about dog bite prevention, the Dog Federation of New York is reaching out to local community leaders with preventative safety and educational programs centered on material published by the Centers for Disease Control.

To help get the message to the community, DFNY will partner with local radio stations in the metro New York area to run dog safety public service announcements from the Campaign For Responsible Ownership. They are based on research and recommendations from both the Centers for Disease Control and the American Veterinary Medical Association.

Legislative Proposals Will Drive Home and Hobby Breeders Out of New York
Force owners to surgically sterilize puppies

An open letter to New York State legislators:

The Dog Federation of New York is a coalition of individual dog owners and dog-related organizations committed to responsible ownership. Our membership spans the State of New York and includes dog and pet related clubs, organizations and individuals. We share a commitment to strong and humane animal welfare laws.

We write to emphatically oppose A 11509 and S 8546, bills regarding "pet dealers" which dramatically change the definition and regulation of dog (and cat) breeders in New York. If enacted, we believe that the regulations, restrictions and requirements placed on dog breeders will shut down all but the very largest commercial facilities, thereby depriving New Yorkers of access to locally bred, locally raised dogs and puppies. In addition to depriving thousands of New Yorkers of their hobbies, the proposal would make us all dependent on dogs and puppies imported from great distances when we look for pets and working companions.

Clearly, this is not a step in right direction – not for pets, not for the people who love them. We urge our elected representatives to oppose A11509 and S8546. They will work to the detriment of animal welfare in New York State.

The Dog Federation of New York is committed to helping New York ‘s elected officials respond appropriately to the concerns we all share: protecting the health and safety of the citizens of New York, promoting strong and humane animal welfare laws, and helping New York remain a dog-friendly, dog-safe place to live. We would be pleased to work with you to accomplish these goals.

DFNY Responsible Dog Owner classes in Islip and Huntington!

You’ve Got a New Puppy. Now What?

Islip
Supervisor Nolan and Dog Federation of New York Unleash Second Round of Classes for 2008

(from Town of Islip news)

Islip, NY - After partnering on a successful program of responsible dog owner classes, Islip Town Supervisor Phil Nolan and the Dog Federation of New York have unleashed the final installment of the 2008 schedule for their Responsible Dog Owner Class. “This class has been a major success - the May classes were full even before we announced the dates,” said Supervisor Nolan. “I encourage other municipalities to offer classes like this, which benefit our residents, our pet population and everyone who comes in contact with a dog whose owner has taken the course.” The FREE, two-hour class features commentary and training tips by professional trainers, veterinarians and other dog-related professionals. The class educates both first-time and veteran dog owners with a fun learning opportunity. As thanks for coming, participants will receive free goodie bags loaded with treats and toys for dogs. However, please note this class is for people only. Parents are encouraged to bring children over the age of ten.

Classes are held from 6 p.m. until 9 p.m. on the following Wednesdays: June 11th and 25th (classes are full)
July 9th and 23rd
August 13th and 27th
September 10th and 24th
October 8th and 22nd
November 5th and 19th
December 3rd and 17th
Interested dog owners should call this Town number at (631) 224-5640 to reserve a spot in an upcoming class.

Huntington

The Town of Huntington partners with the Dog Federation of New York to offer responsible dog ownership classes. This is the second town to join this successful program.

The first class will be held on Tuesday, June 17th at 6 PM. For more information you may contact Nancy Hassel at Nancy1272@yahoo.com.

New Rochelle Law Forcing

Dog Owners From Park

Challenged in Court

Dog Federation Of New York supports challenge to unlawful, discriminatory public policies targeting law-abiding dog owners.

New York, NY – February 20, 2008 - The Dog Federation of New York (DFNY) made a motion to appear as amicus curiae (“friend-of-the-court”) on February 15, 2008 in the case of During et. al v. The City of New Rochelle, New York,. The papers delivered to the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division, Second Department, support a suit previously brought by dog owners Dennis C. During, Michael S. Friscia and Marci Malone against the City of New Rochelle and now under appeal. The dog owners seek nullification of New Rochelle’s illegal, unfair and punitive local ordinance requiring them to obtain extra photo identifications and permits, and pay special additional fees, simply to walk a dog in a public park.

Dog walkers with leashed dogs in Ward Acres Park in New Rochelle are subject to a disturbing stop-and-search policy in which police officers are instructed to stop people walking their dogs and demand to see a special “Ward Acres Dog Permit” photo identification. Persons unable to produce the special permits are asked to leave the park and, under the terms of the Ordinance, they are potentially subject to fines and/or imprisonment.

"As a statewide coalition of law-abiding dog owners, we are deeply concerned when a municipality illegally targets residents and tax-payers whose only “crime” is walking a dog in a public place," stated DFNY spokesperson Mahlon Goer. “New Rochelle residents and non-residents alike are not second class citizens, and state law protects them from unwarranted searches, special permit requirements, extra dog taxes, and other infringements of their civil liberties.”

The law suit, brought by New Rochelle resident and non-residents and supported by the Dog Federation of New York, points out numerous violations of state law in the ordinance. New York State’s Constitution and laws protect all of its citizens from discrimination, including dog owners.

"Ward Acres was the last park in New Rochelle open to people who want to walk their dogs, and now the City Council seems bent on forcing them out of it. Close to half of all households in New York include at least one dog, and we are surprised and dismayed to see that a better accommodation could not be worked out,” Goer continued. “Our goal is to promote dog-friendly and dog-safe communities for all New Yorkers. We are confident that better solutions are available.”

Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP in New York City represents the Dog Federation of New York in this matter. The case was originally filed on April 16, 2007, Dennis C. During, Michael S. Friscia and Marci Malone v. The City of New Rochelle, New York in NY State Supreme Court, Westchester Co., Hon. W. D. Donovan, Index No. 6561/07.

For further information on the amicus brief, please contact the Dog Federation of New York: dogfedny@aol.com

For further background on Ward Acres, please visit We Love Ward Acres.

City Of Auburn Plan To Restrict Pet Ownership
Violates New York State Law

Pet Ordinance Threatens Dog Ownership and Encroaches on Civil Rights

New York, NY, December 21, 2007 - The Dog Federation of New York (DFNY), a statewide coalition of dog owners and dog-related organizations, today voiced grave concern over a proposal before the Auburn City Council to place numerous restrictions on responsible and caring dog owners and disregard New York State laws.

Elected officials in Auburn, New York began consideration of a proposal which curtails ownership of Doberman Pinschers, Bull Terriers and “pitbulls”, in direct violation of the long-standing New York state law which protects residents from breed discrimination. Auburn plans to negatively profile and penalize dogs and dog owners based on the dog’s appearance, not behavior.

The plan also arbitrarily limits the number of dogs permitted in each Auburn home and defines hunting dogs as “dangerous.” DFNY points out that limit laws jeopordize dog lovers, those who rescue or foster animals and home hobby breeders, forcing them to move from their homes or give up their pets. There is no grandfather clause included in the proposal.

The Auburn ordinance would also eliminate the rights of dog owners to court hearings, the appeals process, and other basic civil rights. Angered city residents are rallying to oppose the lengthy and burdensome proposal.

“Auburn’s pet owners are not second class citizens, and we are particularly concerned about the civil rights issues and the violations of long-standing state laws. Pet owners in Auburn, New York are entitled to the same rights and responsibilities as every other American citizen,” said DFNY spokesperson Mahlon Goer.

The Dog Federation of New York sent a letter to the City Council urging officials to set the proposed ordinance aside. “Quality of life is important for all of Auburn’s residents, but this is not a solution to barking dog complaints,” continued Goer.

“The current proposal unnecessarily interferes with lawful dog owners and property usages, and it does not reflect the needs or values of Auburn’s residents. It is certain to drive shelter surrenders up”, said Ms. Goer. “DFNY would be pleased to work with the City of Auburn on a proactive approach to support responsible dog ownership and ensure quality of life for all citizens.”