DFNY Speaks Truth to Power

Because it is so important that our elected officials and public servants base public policy decisions on correct information, and input reflecting the values and needs of New York residents and constituents, the Dog Federation of New York is pleased to share a series of "talking point" flyers for concerned dog owners and pet lovers.

We invite you to take these flyers with you when you visit your representatives. Watch this spot for additional flyers on other subjects of concern to caring New York dog owners.

The Truth about. . .

Tethering

Dogfighting

"Puppymills"

Tail Docking

Keep in touch! Join the DFNY elist for further information on these and other issues!

Dog Federation of New York Sets Record Straight on
New York’s Dog and Animal Fighting Statutes

Group Expresses Concern that Inaccurate Information May Encourage Mistrust and Fear

March 5, 2009 – New York, NY -- Responding to irresponsibly-worded statements circulating on the internet regarding New York’s dog and animal fighting statutes, members of the Dog Federation of New York (DFNY) today provided the facts for worried pet lovers. Contrary to recent media coverage, New York’s anti-dogfighting statutes are among the most comprehensive in the nation.

"Only a person unfamiliar with our laws and how they function would describe them as ‘weak’," commented Mahlon Goer, spokesperson. “Under state law, a number of felony charges are available to prosecutors in dog-fighting cases. Our statutes and penalties are in line with, and in some cases exceed, those of neighboring states.”

“We were disappointed to see poorly-considered and speculative comments circulating on the web. Bad information only deepens misunderstanding, and encourages heightened levels of mistrust and fear of both dogs and dog owners. New Yorkers deserve public policy based on fact, not fear.”

The abhorrent crimes of organized dog and animal-fighting are serious offenses in New York, and DFNY hastened to correct any mistaken impressions that these crimes are common.

The New York-based ASPCA enforces animal cruelty laws, including anti-dogfighting statutes, in the City of New York. The ASPCA cautions that dogfighting exists all over the United States, but that it is not prevalent in New York City.

Information made available by the New York State Department of Criminal Justice indicates that for the last ten years, the number of convictions per year on animal-fighting charges in New York City typically hovers in the very low single digits. For several years out of the last ten, no convictions on animal-fighting charges were recorded for New York City. Statistics for New York State follow a similar pattern.

“Dogfighting is a heinous crime with serious consequences. We want to make sure that New York’s caring dog owners and pet lovers, and our public officials, have the facts before them,” said Ms. Goer. DFNY offers its resources and assistance to the public and community leaders to help educate the public on New York’s dog and animal fighting statutes and related issues. The group’s website offers information on these topics.

About the Dog Federation of New York:

The Dog Federation of New York is a statewide coalition of dog clubs, organizations and individual dog owners that serves the public interest by educating citizens and public officials on dog safety and responsible dog ownership. DFNY advocates for strong, and humane dog-related legislation and is committed to working with municipalities across the state to implement preventative dog safety education.

Read New York State's statutes on animal fighting.

New Rochelle Dog Owners Successful in Lawsuit Against City
Challenge Secures Reasonable Access to Public Space

Dog Federation Of New York congratulates local residents who challenged policies restricting and penalizing law-abiding citizens

The Dog Federation of New York (DFNY) celebrates news of a final settlement in the lawsuit brought by three New Rochelle dog owners against the City of New Rochelle. The lawsuit centered on whether the City of New Rochelle could require law-abiding dog owners to buy costly special licenses simply to walk a leashed dog in a public park. Long an advocate of reasonable access to public spaces for responsible dog owners, DFNY appeared as amicus curiae in the suit, captioned During et. al v. The City of New Rochelle.

The New Rochelle ordinance required the purchase an expensive special license to walk dogs, leashed or unleashed, in the open public parkland of Ward Acres. Following commencement of the suit, the City of New Rochelle dropped the special licensing requirement and also agreed to substantially reduce fees charged for use of a three acre fenced-in dog park located within Ward Acres. Ward Acres is the only park open to dog walkers in the City of New Rochelle.

“Thanks to the perseverance of dog owners in New Rochelle, walking a dog in Ward Acres Park is no longer subject to special fees and police scrutiny,” commented Dog Federation of New York spokesperson Mahlon Goer. “As law-abiding and caring dog owners, we believe that reasonable access to public space for all members of the community is essential. We are very pleased with the outcome in New Rochelle.”

“Close to half of all households in New York include at least one dog,” Goer continued. “Our goal is to promote dog-friendly and dog-safe communities for all New Yorkers, and we are very happy that a fair accommodation was reached.”

About During et al. v. City of New Rochelle
The case was originally filed on April 16, 2007, as Dennis C. During, Michael S. Friscia and Marci Malone v. The City of New Rochelle in New York Supreme Court, Westchester County, Hon. W. D. Donovan presiding, Index No. 6561/07. The law firm of Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP in New York City represented the Dog Federation of New York as amicus curiae on a pro bono basis.

Press contacts: Patricia B. Wild, Attorney for Plaintiffs (914) 834-3969
Jeffrey P. Wiegand, Press Contact (914) 374-8320
To learn more about Ward Acres, the Westchester dog-owning community, visit We Love Ward Acres.

About the Dog Federation of New York
The Dog Federation of New York is a statewide coalition of dog clubs, organizations and individual dog owners that serves the public interest by educating citizens and public officials on dog safety and responsible dog ownership. DFNY advocates for strong, and humane dog-related legislation and is committed to working with municipalities across the state.

Westchester Dog Owners Win Appeals Court Decision

Dog Federation Of New York celebrates decision allowing challenge to
unlawful, discriminatory public policies targeting law-abiding dog owners

New York, NY – October 15, 2008 - The Dog Federation of New York (DFNY), appearing as amicus curiae in the case of During et. al v. The City of New Rochelle, applauds a decision from the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division, Second Department, reversing a lower court dismissal of the case. During oral argument on September 15, the Presiding Judge advised the City of New Rochelle to try to settle with local dog owners. The case is remitted to the Supreme Court, Westchester County for further proceedings.

The New Rochelle dog owners seek nullification of the city’s unprecedented, illegal, and punitive local ordinance, which unfairly requires them to obtain extra photo identifications and licenses, and pay special additional fees, simply to walk a dog in a public park. Dog walkers with leashed dogs in Ward Acres Park in New Rochelle are subject to a disturbing stop-and-search policy in which police officers are instructed to stop people walking their dogs and demand to see a special “Ward Acres Dog Permit” photo identification. Persons unable to produce the special licenses are asked to leave the park and, under the terms of the Ordinance, they are potentially subject to fines and/or imprisonment.

"As a statewide coalition of law-abiding dog owners, we are deeply concerned when a municipality illegally targets residents and tax-payers whose only ‘crime’ is walking a dog in a public place," stated DFNY spokesperson Mahlon Goer. “New Rochelle residents and non-residents alike are not second class citizens, and state law protects them from unwarranted searches, special license requirements, extra taxes, and other infringements of their civil liberties.”

"Ward Acres was the last park in New Rochelle open to people who want to walk their dogs, and now the City Council seems bent on forcing them out of it. Close to half of all households in New York include at least one dog, and we were surprised and dismayed to see that a better accommodation could not be worked out,” Goer continued. “Our goal is to promote dog-friendly and dog-safe communities for all New Yorkers. We are confident that better solutions are available.”

Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP in New York City represented the Dog Federation of New York in the appeal. The case was originally filed on April 16, 2007, as Dennis C. During, Michael S. Friscia and Marci Malone v. The City of New Rochelle in New York Supreme Court, Westchester County, Hon. W. D. Donovan presiding, Index No. 6561/07.

For further information on the amicus brief, please contact the Dog Federation of New York. A copy of the appeals court decision is available via this link.

To learn more about Ward Acres, the Westchester dog-owning community, visit www.WeLoveWardAcres.net.

About the Dog Federation of New York:
The Dog Federation of New York is a statewide coalition of dog clubs, organizations and individual dog owners that serves the public interest by educating citizens and public officials on dog safety and responsible dog ownership. DFNY advocates for strong, and humane dog-related legislation and is committed to working with municipalities across the state.
Visit us on the web at www.DogFederationofNewYork.org

###

Dog Federation of New York Expresses Sorrow at Death of Staten Island Dog Attack Victim, Urges Full Investigation of Previous Complaints

Group Stresses Prevention of Tragedies Through Enforcement of Laws Requiring Humane Containment of Dogs

August 21, 2008 – New York, NY: The Dog Federation of New York (DFNY) today issued a statement expressing deepest condolences to the family of Mr. Henry Piotrowski upon news of his death following a dog attack on Staten Island earlier this summer.

“Sadly, Mr. Piotrowski’s death could have been prevented” said Mahlon Goer of the DFNY. “According to neighbors, city authorities were alerted eight or nine times regarding those dogs. That is eight or nine missed opportunities to prevent Mr. Piotrowski’s death. We question why the city failed to respond to complaints of loose and threatening dogs and reiterate our call for a full and complete investigation.”

Ms. Goer continued, “It is critical that we educate our entire community, especially our children and the elderly, about safety around dogs and the importance of responsible, humane restraint and containment.” Mr. Piotrowski was 90 years old when he died.

DFNY offers its resources, free of charge, to the family, the public, and city leaders. To help educate the public about dog bite prevention, the Dog Federation of New York reaches out to local community leaders with preventative safety and educational programs centered on material published by the Centers for Disease Control and the American Veterinary Medicine Association.

According to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), almost all dog bites are preventable and fatalities are exceedingly rare. Neither the breed of dog, nor the method of restraint, are reliable indicators of the likelihood of dog bites. The Centers for Disease Control warns that dog bite-related fatalities are very unusual occurrences and that such tragedies should not be used to formulate public safety policies.

“It is our goal to educate every New Yorker about dog bite prevention and keeping our communities safe,” said Ms. Goer. To help get the message to the community, DFNY offers free Public Service Announcements (PSA’s) on dog bite prevention from the Campaign for Responsible Ownership. The PSA’s are based on research and recommendations from both the Centers for Disease Control and the American Veterinary Medical Association.

Peter Vallone, Jr. Joins Animal Rights Extremists In Plan To Ban Dog Breeds And Humane Restraint

Dog Federation Of New York rejects NYC Councilman Peter Vallone Jr.’s plan based on animal extremism and discriminatory profiling of dogs and their owners

New York, NY – July 10, 2008 - The Dog Federation of New York (DFNY) is calling on dog owners throughout New York State to reject New York City Councilman Peter Vallone Jr.’s plans to work with animal rights extremists at PETA to ban certain breeds of dogs and enact anti-tethering laws which ban the humane restraint of dogs and endanger the community.

According to the New York Sun, Peter Vallone, Jr. is welcoming support by PETA to help push his plan foward. PETA, an animal rights extremist organization, is known for calling mothers who give their children milk or meat “abusive” or “murderers”, equating pet ownership to slavery, and providing support to domestic terrorists Rodney Coronado and ALF, the Animal Liberation Front.

In addition, PETA angered many of the state's animal welfare advocates by calling for the euthanasia of all “pitbulls” in shelters. According to the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, PETA killed over 97% of animals in their care in 2006. . "We are deeply concerned about Councilman Vallone's motives and his grasp of the facts. His association with PETA is troubling," stated DFNY spokesperson Mahlon Goer.

“Councilman Vallone’s focus should be on increasing the health and safety of the community in accordance with the fact-based guidelines set forth by Centers For Disease Control and the American Veterinary Medical Association.”

Earlier this month, a dog attack on Staten Island involved unrestrained, loose dogs which were reportedly allowed to roam free on numerous occasions despite repeated complaints to authorities from the community. The DFNY immediately called for a full investigation as to why police and animal control failed to respond to numerous calls made by concerned neighbors about loose and roaming dogs.

Following this incident, Vallone announced his plan to ask the New York State Legislature to overturn the long-standing New York State law that protects dogs from breed discrimination, and to restrict the ability of caring dog owners to safely and humanely restrain their pets.

“Sadly, Mr. Vallone is choosing to exploit this tragic situation to grab headlines with inflammatory statements and false or misleading information”. If the dogs had been securely and humanely restrained, the attack may have been prevented. Proper tethering is a responsible and humane form of restraint which safeguards both the community and the dog.”

Ms. Goer further stated, “It is imperative that we protect our children and communities with laws based on facts, not fear. Councilman Vallone consistently has used misinformation as a calculated means to heighten public fears and misunderstanding, along with employing provocative language and negative stereotypes."

“Anti-tethering laws also unfairly target the poor, and may disproportionately affect African-American and Hispanic dog owners living in urban or rural areas. We are worried about his agenda,” said Goer. “Race may be a factor”.

Councilman Vallone’s proposal to discriminate against good dogs and caring dog owners with a breed ban and anti-tethering law was thoroughly rejected by New York’s concerned pet owners and animal groups last year.

Despite claims floating on the Internet that tethering dogs increases aggression, the claims have no basis in fact. Goer cited the expert testimony of Dr. Katherine Houpt of Cornell University’s College of Veterinary Medicine Department of Biomedical Sciences, the country’s leading expert on the issue of tethering. Dr. Houpt, who has studied the issue for years, found that tethering does not increase aggression in dogs.

Furthermore, neither the U. S. government's Centers for Disease Control (CDC), nor the American Veterinary Medicine Association (AVMA) condones anti-tethering laws. Spokespeople for both organizations indicate that there is no scientific evidence to support such efforts.

Goer continued, "Both of Councilman Vallone’s proposals are based on bad information. Since he couldn’t ban breeds, now he wants a tethering law. Vallone’s lack of concern for good dogs and good owners, and his obvious profiling tactics, reflect poorly on him. They are an embarrassment for the New York City Council, and all New York dog lovers."

“We want to make sure that New York remains the most dog-friendly place in the world”, said Ms. Goer. “Discrimination, whether against dogs or their owners, is just not acceptable”.

DFNY Sends Sympathies to Staten Island Dog Attack Victim,
Urges Full Investigation of Previous Complaints

Group Aims to Prevent Future Tragedies Through Enforcement
of Laws Requiring Humane Containment of Dogs

July 2, 2008 – New York, NY -- In response to news of a dog attack resulting in serious injuries in Staten Island, New York, members of the Dog Federation of New York (DFNY) today issued a statement of sympathy and support for Henry Piotrowski and his family. Mr. Piotrowski was gravely injured by two dogs that entered his yard. Press reports indicate that residents had complained repeatedly about the dogs, which have since been euthanized.

"Our hearts go out to Mr. Piotrowski, his family and his friends," commented Mahlon Goer, spokesperson. “While the exact events leading to the attack are still unknown, it appears that the dogs were allowed to roam and menace members of the community on previous occasions, and that authorities were alerted repeatedly. We are calling for a full investigation into the circumstances which led to this tragedy.”

According to the Centers for Disease Control, almost all dog bites are preventable. Neither the breed of dog, nor the method of restraint are reliable indicators of the likelihood of dog bites.

“We want to make sure we educate the entire community to prevent future tragedies such as this,” said Ms. Goer. DFNY is offering its resources and assistance to the family, the public, and community leaders. To help educate the public about dog bite prevention, the Dog Federation of New York is reaching out to local community leaders with preventative safety and educational programs centered on material published by the Centers for Disease Control.

To help get the message to the community, DFNY will partner with local radio stations in the metro New York area to run dog safety public service announcements from the Campaign For Responsible Ownership. They are based on research and recommendations from both the Centers for Disease Control and the American Veterinary Medical Association.

Legislative Proposals Will Drive Home and Hobby Breeders Out of New York
Force owners to surgically sterilize puppies

An open letter to New York State legislators:

The Dog Federation of New York is a coalition of individual dog owners and dog-related organizations committed to responsible ownership. Our membership spans the State of New York and includes dog and pet related clubs, organizations and individuals. We share a commitment to strong and humane animal welfare laws.

We write to emphatically oppose A 11509 and S 8546, bills regarding "pet dealers" which dramatically change the definition and regulation of dog (and cat) breeders in New York. If enacted, we believe that the regulations, restrictions and requirements placed on dog breeders will shut down all but the very largest commercial facilities, thereby depriving New Yorkers of access to locally bred, locally raised dogs and puppies. In addition to depriving thousands of New Yorkers of their hobbies, the proposal would make us all dependent on dogs and puppies imported from great distances when we look for pets and working companions.

Clearly, this is not a step in right direction – not for pets, not for the people who love them. We urge our elected representatives to oppose A11509 and S8546. They will work to the detriment of animal welfare in New York State.

The Dog Federation of New York is committed to helping New York ‘s elected officials respond appropriately to the concerns we all share: protecting the health and safety of the citizens of New York, promoting strong and humane animal welfare laws, and helping New York remain a dog-friendly, dog-safe place to live. We would be pleased to work with you to accomplish these goals.

DFNY Responsible Dog Owner classes in Islip and Huntington!

You’ve Got a New Puppy. Now What?

Islip
Supervisor Nolan and Dog Federation of New York Unleash Second Round of Classes for 2008

(from Town of Islip news)

Islip, NY - After partnering on a successful program of responsible dog owner classes, Islip Town Supervisor Phil Nolan and the Dog Federation of New York have unleashed the final installment of the 2008 schedule for their Responsible Dog Owner Class. “This class has been a major success - the May classes were full even before we announced the dates,” said Supervisor Nolan. “I encourage other municipalities to offer classes like this, which benefit our residents, our pet population and everyone who comes in contact with a dog whose owner has taken the course.” The FREE, two-hour class features commentary and training tips by professional trainers, veterinarians and other dog-related professionals. The class educates both first-time and veteran dog owners with a fun learning opportunity. As thanks for coming, participants will receive free goodie bags loaded with treats and toys for dogs. However, please note this class is for people only. Parents are encouraged to bring children over the age of ten.

Classes are held from 6 p.m. until 9 p.m. on the following Wednesdays: June 11th and 25th (classes are full)
July 9th and 23rd
August 13th and 27th
September 10th and 24th
October 8th and 22nd
November 5th and 19th
December 3rd and 17th
Interested dog owners should call this Town number at (631) 224-5640 to reserve a spot in an upcoming class.

Huntington

The Town of Huntington partners with the Dog Federation of New York to offer responsible dog ownership classes. This is the second town to join this successful program.

The first class will be held on Tuesday, June 17th at 6 PM. For more information you may contact Nancy Hassel at Nancy1272@yahoo.com.

New Rochelle Law Forcing

Dog Owners From Park

Challenged in Court

Dog Federation Of New York supports challenge to unlawful, discriminatory public policies targeting law-abiding dog owners.

New York, NY – February 20, 2008 - The Dog Federation of New York (DFNY) made a motion to appear as amicus curiae (“friend-of-the-court”) on February 15, 2008 in the case of During et. al v. The City of New Rochelle, New York,. The papers delivered to the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division, Second Department, support a suit previously brought by dog owners Dennis C. During, Michael S. Friscia and Marci Malone against the City of New Rochelle and now under appeal. The dog owners seek nullification of New Rochelle’s illegal, unfair and punitive local ordinance requiring them to obtain extra photo identifications and permits, and pay special additional fees, simply to walk a dog in a public park.

Dog walkers with leashed dogs in Ward Acres Park in New Rochelle are subject to a disturbing stop-and-search policy in which police officers are instructed to stop people walking their dogs and demand to see a special “Ward Acres Dog Permit” photo identification. Persons unable to produce the special permits are asked to leave the park and, under the terms of the Ordinance, they are potentially subject to fines and/or imprisonment.

"As a statewide coalition of law-abiding dog owners, we are deeply concerned when a municipality illegally targets residents and tax-payers whose only “crime” is walking a dog in a public place," stated DFNY spokesperson Mahlon Goer. “New Rochelle residents and non-residents alike are not second class citizens, and state law protects them from unwarranted searches, special permit requirements, extra dog taxes, and other infringements of their civil liberties.”

The law suit, brought by New Rochelle resident and non-residents and supported by the Dog Federation of New York, points out numerous violations of state law in the ordinance. New York State’s Constitution and laws protect all of its citizens from discrimination, including dog owners.

"Ward Acres was the last park in New Rochelle open to people who want to walk their dogs, and now the City Council seems bent on forcing them out of it. Close to half of all households in New York include at least one dog, and we are surprised and dismayed to see that a better accommodation could not be worked out,” Goer continued. “Our goal is to promote dog-friendly and dog-safe communities for all New Yorkers. We are confident that better solutions are available.”

Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP in New York City represents the Dog Federation of New York in this matter. The case was originally filed on April 16, 2007, Dennis C. During, Michael S. Friscia and Marci Malone v. The City of New Rochelle, New York in NY State Supreme Court, Westchester Co., Hon. W. D. Donovan, Index No. 6561/07.

For further information on the amicus brief, please contact the Dog Federation of New York: dogfedny@aol.com

For further background on Ward Acres, please visit We Love Ward Acres.

City Of Auburn Plan To Restrict Pet Ownership
Violates New York State Law

Pet Ordinance Threatens Dog Ownership and Encroaches on Civil Rights

New York, NY, December 21, 2007 - The Dog Federation of New York (DFNY), a statewide coalition of dog owners and dog-related organizations, today voiced grave concern over a proposal before the Auburn City Council to place numerous restrictions on responsible and caring dog owners and disregard New York State laws.

Elected officials in Auburn, New York began consideration of a proposal which curtails ownership of Doberman Pinschers, Bull Terriers and “pitbulls”, in direct violation of the long-standing New York state law which protects residents from breed discrimination. Auburn plans to negatively profile and penalize dogs and dog owners based on the dog’s appearance, not behavior.

The plan also arbitrarily limits the number of dogs permitted in each Auburn home and defines hunting dogs as “dangerous.” DFNY points out that limit laws jeopordize dog lovers, those who rescue or foster animals and home hobby breeders, forcing them to move from their homes or give up their pets. There is no grandfather clause included in the proposal.

The Auburn ordinance would also eliminate the rights of dog owners to court hearings, the appeals process, and other basic civil rights. Angered city residents are rallying to oppose the lengthy and burdensome proposal.

“Auburn’s pet owners are not second class citizens, and we are particularly concerned about the civil rights issues and the violations of long-standing state laws. Pet owners in Auburn, New York are entitled to the same rights and responsibilities as every other American citizen,” said DFNY spokesperson Mahlon Goer.

The Dog Federation of New York sent a letter to the City Council urging officials to set the proposed ordinance aside. “Quality of life is important for all of Auburn’s residents, but this is not a solution to barking dog complaints,” continued Goer.

“The current proposal unnecessarily interferes with lawful dog owners and property usages, and it does not reflect the needs or values of Auburn’s residents. It is certain to drive shelter surrenders up”, said Ms. Goer. “DFNY would be pleased to work with the City of Auburn on a proactive approach to support responsible dog ownership and ensure quality of life for all citizens.”

New Rochelle: Fees and photo ID's required
to walk leashed dogs in a public park!

Police Department to dog owners: "Let me see your papers" ?!?

(Following report from Jeff Wiegand of We Love Ward Acres, New Rochelle)

Help us repeal "Bramson's Bullying" in New Rochelle

Hello fellow dog lovers! I am new to this group and would like tointroduce you to an outrageous ordinance ("Bramson's Bullying" - he's our Mayor) enacted April 1st of this year in New Rochelle.

In brief, the city now requires dog owners who wish to walk withtheir pets in a 62 acre open parkland called "Ward Acres" (purchasedwith state funds) to get a PHOTO ID and pay $50 (residents) and $250 (non-residents) per dog per year. The photo ID and fees apply whether you are walking on or off-leash as the city has allowed somevery limited off-leash recreation.

The city is deliberately directing armed police officers to enter thepark, STOP law-abiding citizens and demand to see their photo IDs.Many long-time users of the park are now AFRAID to go there.Penalties of up to $250 and FIFTEEN DAYS IN JAIL are possible.

WE HAVE YET TO FIND ANY MUNICIPALITY IN AMERICA THAT DOES THIS.

This ordinance is illegal under NY state law, we believe, and it has needlessly destroyed a decades-old community of dog owners who have peacably shared their lives and pets together in Ward Acres mostly off-leash.

You can go to our web site www.WeLoveWardAcres.net for more info and read about the lawsuit that has been filed.

We are publicizing this issue in advance of the Nov 6th elections andwe have a Voters Guide on our web site which identifies dog-friendly New Rochelle candidates.

This fight is much more than an on/off leash issue. These rules violate our civil liberties and even apply to on-leash dog walking.We NEED ALLIES in this fight as the city is dismissive of our entreaties. If this ordinance stands, look for municipalities near you to try the same thing!

Jeff & Lulu
www.WeLoveWardAcres.net
lulu@welovewardacres.net

WVOX Bob Marrone Morning Show 8:30 a m
Friday October 19
"Pit Bulls", BSL and much more: Part II

Tune in!

Not satisfied with the October 12 "debate"? Not a problem!

We will continue a discussion of NYC and NYS dangerous dog laws, and the myths and misinformation that the proponents of breed specific legislation--such as NYC Councilman Peter Vallone Jr.--use to support their position.

Councilman Vallone is an outspoken proponent of breed specific legislation, and would like to ban pit bulls from the City of New York.

If you are in the New Rochelle area, tune in! If you're not, listen live via the internet!

So, once again, set the automatic coffee brewer, and put the phone on "do not disturb"! You won't want to miss a word!

Dog Federation of New York Responds To Proposals to Restrict Dog Ownership

In Town Of Haverstraw

New York, NY – September 28, 2007: The Dog Federation of New York (DFNY), a statewide coalition of dog owners and dog-related organizations, issued a statement today expressing deepest concern over a new ordinance unanimously approved by Town of Haverstraw Councilmembers to restrict dog ownership by limiting the number of dogs town residents are allowed to own.

In press reports Haverstraw Town Supervisor Howard T. Phillips indicated that similar limitations on cat ownership may be discussed in the future, and consideration of breed specific measures was mentioned.

Responding to a barking dog complaint, on September 24 the Town of Haverstraw approved a limit law that restricts the number of pets permitted in each resident’s home. That plan has angered many town residents, who are coming out in force to oppose the law.

Breed specific measures are illegal in New York State, and they are opposed by every credible animal welfare organization in the country.

“Quality of life is an important issue, and residents should not be subjected to excessive barking,” said Mahlon Goer, DFNY spokesperson. “Dogs should not be allowed to become a nuisance to the community. However, limiting the number of dogs at a residence is not the best solution for excessive barking and there are better remedies available to address other concerns.”

“Simply put, the number of dogs in a household does not equate to noise. A single dog that barks excessively can be a huge problem, while other homes that include several quiet dogs cause no inconvenience or concern at all. We would hope that the Town of Haverstraw will choose to reconsider their actions and not target the vast majority of residents who are caring and responsible dog owners.”

Haverstraw’s limit law plan will also have a negative impact on the rescue community. “There are many people who voluntarily shelter homeless dogs without adding to the taxpayer’s expense. They foster dogs in their homes. This ordinance would be a death knell for many innocent dogs.” Ms. Goer also cited constitutional issues with the proposal, as similar ordinances have been overturned as violations of the 14th Amendment.

Under the new law, residents will be limited to four dogs. There is no "grandfather clause" for pets that may have resided in Haverstraw homes for many years.

“We fear that this law unnecessarily interferes with typical, lawful dog ownership and does not reflect the needs or values of town residents”, Ms. Goer continued. “DFNY would be pleased to work with the Town of Haverstraw on a proactive approach to support responsible dog ownership and ensure quality of life for all citizens.”

As a best practice, the DFNY supports addressing noise complaints with enforcement of nuisance or noise ordinances such as those already in place in Haverstraw, a recommendation from the Campaign For Responsible Ownership. “We are confident that a better, more effective solution is available that will address the needs of all residents of the community.”

The DFNY offers assistance to the Town of Haverstraw in crafting a solution and encourages the town to fairly, consistently and strictly enforce reasonable animal control measures and nuisance noise ordinances.

“Our goal is to support responsible dog ownership throughout New York State, said Ms. Goer. “The DFNY would be pleased to work with the Town of Haverstraw on a proactive approach to support responsible dog ownership and ensure quality of life for all citizens.”

On August 19 New Yorkers stood together in peace to send a powerful message:

Save our dogs!


Across New York, and around the world, dog lovers lit candles in rememberance of the innocent dogs everywhere that have died due to discrimination and hate.
More than 300 vigils worldwide, including 12 in New York, were hosted by caring dog owners. Some were private vigils in homes, others were in the center of town. It didn't matter. The message was clear: Discrimination is killing our dogs. Stop the killing.

Information on how you can participate in next year's event is available at the Light a Candle, Save a Life website.

If you are in New York: Please visit Dog Friendly Plattsburgh and be sure to download and circulate our petition opposing the Plattsburgh
Resolution. The City of Plattsburgh passed a resolution to permit breed specific legislation in New York earlier this year. Don't let the discrimination return to New York.

Plattsburgh moves to profile dogs and dog owners in New York State

On July 12 the City Council of Plattsburgh unanimously approved a resolution which calls upon the New York State legislature to rescind New York's law against breed profiling and once again permit breed specific dangerous dog laws.

As a cost-cutting measure, the City of Plattsburgh eliminated its animal control staff. Subsequently, in response to two incidents this spring in which unrestrained dogs attacked other dogs--in one incident a dog owner who was protecting his dog was also bitten--Plattsburgh is now seeking to overturn a state law which has served New York for 10 years.

New York State law on dangerous dogs is among the most comprehensive and strict in the country.

WHAT WE NEED: The Dog Federation of New York requests letters of opposition from every dog club, rescue group, law enforcement, working dog club in the State of New York.

The text of the Plattsburgh Resolution, plus information on how to oppose it, can be found at Dog Friendly Plattsburgh .

PLEASE do not send model ordinances, alternatives, substitutions, "at risk dangerous dog models", "give backs" or anything that in any way limits or restricts dog ownership.

WE ARE NOT NEGOTIATING!!!
Many, many thanks for your cooperation and support!

Town of E. Fishkill Plans to Restrict Property Rights and Limit Pet Ownership

Proposed Ban On Construction Of Small Utility Buildings Without Special Permit Will Limit Pet Ownership

Earlier this year East Fishkill Town Board considered a pet limit law, angering local residents.

Under the current draft proposal for changes to zoning ordinances, East Fishkill plans to limit the construction of dog houses, barns, rabbit hutches, etc., which will have the same net effect of restricting pet ownership.

Residents will be limited to ONE accessory building on their property, such as a small tool shed or greenhouse. There is no "grandfather clause" in the proposal.

Special permits will be necessary for additional small, commonplace structures like dog houses, rabbit hutches, etc.

Note: Dog Federation of New York is particularly concerned about this requirement which may inhibit residents from providing proper shelter to their pets. NYS Animal Cruelty statutes specifically require that dogs outdoors have access to adequate shelter--a dog house--and it is a violation of NYS cruelty laws to deny dogs adequate shelter.

Other concerns include a change to the definition of "commercial kennel" which may force home and hobby breeders to relocate outside of residential zoned districts.

Do you know the NY State laws on dog ownership?

Following are some of the outstanding features of current New York State laws which impact dog ownership.

New York State prohibits breed specific dangerous dog laws, and communities with breed specific legislation cannot legally enforce it. Specifically, Paragraph 107, Section 7 of Agriculture and Markets law states:

"Nothing contained in this article shall prevent a municipality from adopting its own program for the control of dangerous dogs; provided,however, that no such program shall be less stringent than this article, and no such program shall regulate such dogs in a manner that is specific as to breed".

There are several communities in New York which retain BSL on their books. These communities, including Canajoharie, Hempstead, Hornell, Larchmont, Lyons, Newburgh, and Sands Point, are vulnerable to law suit by dog owners who are threatened with prosecution under breed specific statutes.

Dangerous dog law in New York defines such dogs as those which without justification attack or injure human beings or domestic animals, or behave

"in a manner which a reasonable person would believe poses a serious and unjustified imminent threat of serious physical injury or death to one or more persons, companion animals, farm animals or domestic animals"

It is not necessary for a dog to have injured a person or domestic animal to be declared dangerous in New York.

All dogs over the age of four months must have a valid dog license. State law allows animal control authorities to seize unlicensed dogs, whether on or off their owner's property.

New York State has a "puppy lemon law". General Business Article 35-D covers the sale of cats and dogs by pet dealers, and includes remedies for purchasers who within 14 days from acquiring an animal become concerned about the animal's health.

Recently New York enacted a law requiring that dogs outdoors be provided proper shelter. Agriculture and Markets Article 26, Section 353 b reads:

"Any person who owns or has custody or control of a dog that is left outdoors shall provide it with shelter appropriate to its breed, physical condition and the climate."

This section of NYS law defines appropriate shelter and specifies penalties for owners and caretakers who fail to provide necessary housing.

Article 26, Section 26A addresses "pet dealers", and defines a pet dealer as an individual or business that sells more than nine animals to the public for profit. Home or hobby breeders selling or offering to sell more than 25 animals born and raised on their property directly to the public are also considered "pet dealers" and are required to comply with standards of care specified in this section of the law, maintain records as specified, and are subject to inspection.

In New York we have some of the most comprehensive legislation in the country regarding dog and animal fighting. In New York, fighting, possessing for the purpose of fighting, training, breeding or selling dogs (or other animals) for the purpose of fighting is a crime. Being a spectator at a dog fight, or being in possession of a dog where a dog fight has occurred is also a crime.

Know the NYS law and how it affects you. For further details on any state laws concerning dog ownership, you can refer to the Consolidated Laws of New York.

Your municipal clerk's office, whether city, town or village, should be able to advise you on local legislation.

Voter Registration and Information at the
American Cancers Society's DogsWalk Against Cancer

Sunday, May 6

Riverside Park, Manhattan

In partnership with My Dog Votes, DFNY registered new voters and provided information on issues for dog-loving current voters .

The folks from the American Cancer Society were awesome, the weather was great, and the doggies? They were lovin' it.

We met hundreds of new friends and supporters. We don't know about the dogs, but man, we were BEAT by the end of the day!

Our message? Amy Sacks of the NY Daily News said it best: Get arf the couch and go vote!

March 31 [pictured at right: registered voters and caring Astoria dog owners circulate petitions to oppose Councilman Vallone]

DFNY in Astoria, Queens!

Do dog owners in Astoria support Peter Vallone Jr.'s plans to restrict their ability to humanely restrain their pets and ban certain dogs from the City of New York? Do they support backdoor breed bans and negative stereotypes?

Heck, no!

Astoria residents couldn't sign our petitions opposing Councilman Vallone's proposals fast enough!

In addition to gathering signatures from area residents, DFNY explained to shocked dog lovers how Mr. Vallone's tethering proposal will negatively and disproportionately impact the lives of New York's many caring dog owners with limited incomes.

As Astoria resident and pit bull enthusiast Nancy Silva commented on Vallone's tethering plan: "That's just so the city can make more money."

Nancy, we hear you!

Does Peter Vallone Discriminate?

Yes! NYC Councilman Peter Vallone from Queens is unfairly targeting good dogs and good dog owners with unfair and discriminatory proposals!

Are you or your dog the “Wrong” Breed???

What YOU NEED To Know!

Peter Vallone:
· Wants to pass a breed ban!
· Profiles dog owners as criminals!
· Will subject us to breed discrimination!
· Wants to back-door breed bans with anti-tethering laws!

Peter Vallone uses fake science to get his way!

Breed Bans & Anti-Tethering Laws
Unfairly Target and Discriminate against:

· Poor dog owners
· Racial and ethnic minorities
· Make criminals out of responsible dog owners

We need facts, not fear!

RESPONSIBLE DOG OWNERS SAY

NO to Breed Bans!
NO to Anti-Tethering Laws!

TAKE ACTION! Join Us!
Dog Federation of New York--For A Dog-Friendly, Dog-Safe New York